GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Cyclical » Travel & Leisure » LuxUrban Hotels Inc (NAS:LUXH) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

LuxUrban Hotels (LuxUrban Hotels) Beneish M-Score : -0.95 (As of May. 07, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2022. Start your Free Trial

What is LuxUrban Hotels Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Warning Sign:

Beneish M-Score -0.95 higher than -1.78, which implies that the company might have manipulated its financial results.

The historical rank and industry rank for LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LUXH' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.8   Med: -1.38   Max: -0.95
Current: -0.95

During the past 5 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of LuxUrban Hotels was -0.95. The lowest was -1.80. And the median was -1.38.


LuxUrban Hotels Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

LuxUrban Hotels Beneish M-Score Chart

LuxUrban Hotels Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Beneish M-Score
- - - -1.80 -0.95

LuxUrban Hotels Quarterly Data
Dec19 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -1.80 -1.66 -2.02 -1.25 -0.95

Competitive Comparison of LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score

For the Lodging subindustry, LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Travel & Leisure Industry

For the Travel & Leisure industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score falls into.



LuxUrban Hotels Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of LuxUrban Hotels for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1+0.528 * 3.5852+0.404 * 0.6286+0.892 * 2.5875+0.115 * 0.2911
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 1.0716+4.679 * -0.217029-0.327 * 0.963
=-0.95

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Total Receivables was $11.9 Mil.
Revenue was 27.513 + 31.208 + 31.861 + 22.814 = $113.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was -14.421 + 7.812 + 10.179 + 5.362 = $8.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $19.7 Mil.
Total Assets was $283.3 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $242.3 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.1 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $37.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $33.1 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $248.0 Mil.
Net Income was -53.903 + 4.935 + -26.775 + -2.781 = $-78.5 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 1.107 + 0.032 + 0.058 + 0.04 = $1.2 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -11.263 + -2.814 + -4.584 + 0.383 = $-18.3 Mil.
Total Receivables was $0.0 Mil.
Revenue was 12.949 + 11.575 + 10.201 + 9.099 = $43.8 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.117 + 4.889 + 2.857 + 2.513 = $12.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $11.5 Mil.
Total Assets was $108.0 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $83.5 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $0.0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $13.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $25.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $85.8 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(11.852 / 113.396) / (0 / 43.824)
=0.104519 / 0
=1

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(12.376 / 43.824) / (8.932 / 113.396)
=0.282402 / 0.078768
=3.5852

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (19.721 + 242.305) / 283.294) / (1 - (11.548 + 83.522) / 107.963)
=0.075074 / 0.119421
=0.6286

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=113.396 / 43.824
=2.5875

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0.009 / (0.009 + 83.522)) / (0.09 / (0.09 + 242.305))
=0.000108 / 0.000371
=0.2911

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(37.282 / 113.396) / (13.446 / 43.824)
=0.328777 / 0.306818
=1.0716

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((247.998 + 33.126) / 283.294) / ((85.816 + 25.44) / 107.963)
=0.99234 / 1.030501
=0.963

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-78.524 - 1.237 - -18.278) / 283.294
=-0.217029

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

LuxUrban Hotels has a M-score of -0.95 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.


LuxUrban Hotels Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of LuxUrban Hotels's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


LuxUrban Hotels (LuxUrban Hotels) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
2125 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 253, Miami, FL, USA, 33137
LuxUrban Hotels Inc utilizes a long-term lease, asset-light business model to acquire and manage a growing portfolio of short-term rental properties in metropolitan cities. It identifies, acquires, manages, and markets hotel rooms to business and vacation travelers under the consumer brand, LuxUrban. It manages a portfolio of hotel rooms in New York, Washington D.C., Miami Beach, New Orleans and Los Angeles.
Executives
Brian Ferdinand director, officer: Chief Executive Officer 224 MUTTONTOWN EASTWOODS ROAD, MUTTONTOWN NY 11791
Leonard Toboroff director 39 N MOORE ST, STE 6B, NEW YORK NY 10013
Kevin Michael Potts officer: Chief Revenue Officer 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137
Donald Engel director 570 PARK AVE, NEW YORK NY 10065
Shanoop Kothari officer: Chief Financial Officer 2865 SCOTT STREET, SUITE 107, VISTA CA 92081
Aimee Nelson director 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137
Jeffrey Webb director 6589 GREEN SHADOWS, STE 6B, MEMPHIS TN 38119
David Gurfein officer: President & COO 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137
Karl Rothman officer: Chief Accounting Officer 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137
Jimmie Chatmon director, officer: Executive Vice President 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD, MIAMI FL 33137
Kevin Mikolashek officer: Chief Compliance Officer 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137
David Edward Berg director 2125 BISCAYNE BLVD., SUITE 253, MIAMI FL 33137