GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Energy » Oil & Gas » Gazprom PJSC (OTCPK:OGZPY) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Gazprom PJSC (Gazprom PJSC) Beneish M-Score : -1.94 (As of Apr. 26, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 1996. Start your Free Trial

What is Gazprom PJSC Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -1.94 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

OGZPY' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.17   Med: -2.55   Max: -1.94
Current: -1.94

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Gazprom PJSC was -1.94. The lowest was -3.17. And the median was -2.55.


Gazprom PJSC Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Gazprom PJSC Beneish M-Score Chart

Gazprom PJSC Annual Data
Trend Dec13 Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.34 -2.68 -2.60 -2.17 -2.03

Gazprom PJSC Quarterly Data
Dec17 Mar18 Jun18 Sep18 Dec18 Mar19 Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.24 -2.17 -1.97 -2.03 -1.94

Competitive Comparison of Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score

For the Oil & Gas Integrated subindustry, Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Oil & Gas Industry

For the Oil & Gas industry and Energy sector, Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Gazprom PJSC Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Gazprom PJSC for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 1.2627+0.528 * 0.7368+0.404 * 1.4148+0.892 * 0.9361+0.115 * 3.6382
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.3656+4.679 * 0.019878-0.327 * 0.9991
=-1.76

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun23) TTM:Last Year (Sep21) TTM:
Total Receivables was $16,490 Mil.
Revenue was 22313.755 + 0 + 40416.345 + 47558.275 = $110,288 Mil.
Gross Profit was 19823.619 + 0 + 36441.839 + 31086.333 = $87,352 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $50,940 Mil.
Total Assets was $338,860 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $229,676 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $2,814 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $132 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $38,788 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $64,716 Mil.
Net Income was -228.909 + 0 + 16300.385 + 7341.205 = $23,413 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0 + 0 + 0 + 16676.946 = $16,677 Mil.
Total Receivables was $13,950 Mil.
Revenue was 32477.109 + 28118.294 + 30105.937 + 27110.664 = $117,812 Mil.
Gross Profit was 19895.405 + 17516.748 + 17180.202 + 14163.401 = $68,756 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $71,817 Mil.
Total Assets was $355,982 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was $240,916 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was $11,097 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was $385 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $50,217 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $58,614 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(16489.965 / 110288.375) / (13949.644 / 117812.004)
=0.149517 / 0.118406
=1.2627

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(68755.756 / 117812.004) / (87351.791 / 110288.375)
=0.583606 / 0.792031
=0.7368

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (50940.23 + 229675.953) / 338860.028) / (1 - (71817.129 + 240915.992) / 355981.962)
=0.171882 / 0.121492
=1.4148

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=110288.375 / 117812.004
=0.9361

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(11096.848 / (11096.848 + 240915.992)) / (2813.742 / (2813.742 + 229675.953))
=0.044033 / 0.012103
=3.6382

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(131.954 / 110288.375) / (385.387 / 117812.004)
=0.001196 / 0.003271
=0.3656

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((64716.263 + 38788.466) / 338860.028) / ((58614.201 + 50217.499) / 355981.962)
=0.30545 / 0.305723
=0.9991

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(23412.681 - 0 - 16676.946) / 338860.028
=0.019878

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Gazprom PJSC has a M-score of -1.76 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.


Gazprom PJSC Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Gazprom PJSC's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Gazprom PJSC (Gazprom PJSC) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
St. Petersburg, 2/3 Lakhtinsky Avenue, Building No. 1, Moscow, RUS, 197229
Gazprom PJSC is a Russian-based integrated oil and gas company in which the Russian government is a majority shareholder. Much of the business lies within the production, transportation, and distribution of natural gas. The company is a major gas supplier to European countries, with substantial gas pipelines throughout Western Russia and into Europe. While its oil segment is a smaller portion of revenue, the company is still integrated into the production, processing, and refinement of crude oil and refined products. Across both segments, the company produces its oil and gas from fields distributed across Russia, with end markets consisting mostly of Europe and Russia.

Gazprom PJSC (Gazprom PJSC) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Gazprom to Deliver Strong Results

By Alberto Abaterusso 10-07-2021

3 High Earnings Yield Stocks

By Alberto Abaterusso Alberto Abaterusso 05-28-2019

It's Time to Consider Russian Energy Companies

By Chris Mydlo Chris Mydlo 05-27-2014

How Gazprom Can Grow Into its 12% Dividend

By Bram de Haas Bram de Haas 12-30-2019

Gazprom dividends unlock value for shareholders of this undervalued giant

By Dividend Growth Investor Dividend Growth Investor 07-26-2013

Jim Grant Thinks You Should Buy Gazprom!

By Canadian Value Canadian Value 05-06-2014

Gazprom Holds the Key to Meeting Global Energy Needs

By investingdaily investingdaily 12-15-2011