GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Hardware » TRaaS On Product Inc (TSE:6696) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

TRaaS On Product (TSE:6696) Piotroski F-Score : 3 (As of May. 28, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2017. Start your Free Trial

What is TRaaS On Product Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TRaaS On Product has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:6696' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of TRaaS On Product was 8. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.


TRaaS On Product Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

TRaaS On Product Piotroski F-Score Chart

TRaaS On Product Annual Data
Trend Jan16 Jan17 Jan18 Jan19 Jan20 Jan21 Jan22 Jan23 Jan24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 5.00 3.00 2.00 6.00 3.00

TRaaS On Product Quarterly Data
Apr19 Jul19 Oct19 Jan20 Apr20 Jul20 Oct20 Jan21 Apr21 Jul21 Oct21 Jan22 Apr22 Jul22 Oct22 Jan23 Apr23 Jul23 Oct23 Jan24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 - - - 3.00

Competitive Comparison of TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score

For the Communication Equipment subindustry, TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Hardware Industry

For the Hardware industry and Technology sector, TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jan24) TTM:Last Year (Jan23) TTM:
Net Income was 円-85.8 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円-72.6 Mil.
Revenue was 円311.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円169.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jan23)
to the end of this year (Jan24) was (527.913 + 513.342) / 2 = 円520.6275 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jan23) was 円527.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円60.0 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円452.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円45.2 Mil.
Net Income was 円-16.8 Mil.

Revenue was 円496.5 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円235.2 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jan22)
to the end of last year (Jan23) was (298.879 + 527.913) / 2 = 円413.396 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jan22) was 円298.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円157.7 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円494.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円42.3 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TRaaS On Product's current Net Income (TTM) was -85.8. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

TRaaS On Product's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -72.6. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan23)
=-85.81/527.913
=-0.16254572

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan22)
=-16.801/298.879
=-0.05621338

TRaaS On Product's return on assets of this year was -0.16254572. TRaaS On Product's return on assets of last year was -0.05621338. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

TRaaS On Product's current Net Income (TTM) was -85.8. TRaaS On Product's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -72.6. ==> -72.6 > -85.8 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jan24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan23 to Jan24
=60/520.6275
=0.11524555

Gearing (Last Year: Jan23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan22 to Jan23
=157.727/413.396
=0.38153973

TRaaS On Product's gearing of this year was 0.11524555. TRaaS On Product's gearing of last year was 0.38153973. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jan24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=452.487/45.23
=10.00413442

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jan23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=494.21/42.285
=11.68759607

TRaaS On Product's current ratio of this year was 10.00413442. TRaaS On Product's current ratio of last year was 11.68759607. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

TRaaS On Product's number of shares in issue this year was 4.646. TRaaS On Product's number of shares in issue last year was 3.872. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=169.832/310.965
=0.54614506

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=235.232/496.493
=0.47378714

TRaaS On Product's gross margin of this year was 0.54614506. TRaaS On Product's gross margin of last year was 0.47378714. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jan23)
=310.965/527.913
=0.58904592

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jan22)
=496.493/298.879
=1.66118396

TRaaS On Product's asset turnover of this year was 0.58904592. TRaaS On Product's asset turnover of last year was 1.66118396. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+1+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

TRaaS On Product has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

TRaaS On Product  (TSE:6696) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


TRaaS On Product Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of TRaaS On Product's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


TRaaS On Product (TSE:6696) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
2-9-30 Kitasaiwai, Nishi Ward, Yokohama Nishiguchi Kato Building2nd floor, Kanagawa Prefecture, Yokohama, JPN, 220-0004
TRaaS On Product Inc is engaged in telecommunications, followed by the IT revolution, and manufacturing in which the subject of value shifted to something different.

TRaaS On Product (TSE:6696) Headlines

No Headlines