GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Technology » Semiconductors » SkyWater Technology Inc (NAS:SKYT) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

SkyWater Technology (SkyWater Technology) Piotroski F-Score : 7 (As of May. 07, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2021. Start your Free Trial

What is SkyWater Technology Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SkyWater Technology has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SKYT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 7

During the past 5 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of SkyWater Technology was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.


SkyWater Technology Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

SkyWater Technology Piotroski F-Score Chart

SkyWater Technology Annual Data
Trend Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 2.00 5.00 7.00

SkyWater Technology Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 7.00

Competitive Comparison of SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score

For the Semiconductors subindustry, SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Semiconductors Industry

For the Semiconductors industry and Technology sector, SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec23) TTM:Last Year (Dec22) TTM:
Net Income was -4.273 + -8.59 + -7.568 + -10.325 = $-30.8 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -11.086 + -6.922 + -3.654 + 31.743 = $10.1 Mil.
Revenue was 66.094 + 69.811 + 71.624 + 79.153 = $286.7 Mil.
Gross Profit was 16.468 + 16.667 + 14.147 + 12.01 = $59.3 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec22)
to the end of this year (Dec23) was
(305.764 + 292.826 + 298.736 + 299.709 + 316.756) / 5 = $302.7582 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec22) was $305.8 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $45.4 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $146.4 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $144.2 Mil.
Net Income was -16.606 + -13.005 + -6.939 + -3.043 = $-39.6 Mil.

Revenue was 48.121 + 47.407 + 52.326 + 65.087 = $212.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.94 + 2.08 + 8.277 + 16.55 = $26.0 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec22) was
(263.598 + 271.676 + 276.647 + 270.948 + 305.764) / 5 = $277.7266 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was $263.6 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $44.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $116.6 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $132.2 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SkyWater Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -30.8. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

SkyWater Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 10.1. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec22)
=-30.756/305.764
=-0.10058738

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=-39.593/263.598
=-0.1502022

SkyWater Technology's return on assets of this year was -0.10058738. SkyWater Technology's return on assets of last year was -0.1502022. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

SkyWater Technology's current Net Income (TTM) was -30.8. SkyWater Technology's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 10.1. ==> 10.1 > -30.8 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec22 to Dec23
=45.425/302.7582
=0.15003722

Gearing (Last Year: Dec22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec22
=44.538/277.7266
=0.16036635

SkyWater Technology's gearing of this year was 0.15003722. SkyWater Technology's gearing of last year was 0.16036635. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=146.375/144.197
=1.01510434

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=116.551/132.172
=0.88181309

SkyWater Technology's current ratio of this year was 1.01510434. SkyWater Technology's current ratio of last year was 0.88181309. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

SkyWater Technology's number of shares in issue this year was 47.02. SkyWater Technology's number of shares in issue last year was 42.604. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=59.292/286.682
=0.2068215

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=25.967/212.941
=0.12194458

SkyWater Technology's gross margin of this year was 0.2068215. SkyWater Technology's gross margin of last year was 0.12194458. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec22)
=286.682/305.764
=0.93759239

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=212.941/263.598
=0.80782479

SkyWater Technology's asset turnover of this year was 0.93759239. SkyWater Technology's asset turnover of last year was 0.80782479. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+1+1+1+1+0+1+1
=7

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

SkyWater Technology has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

SkyWater Technology  (NAS:SKYT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


SkyWater Technology Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of SkyWater Technology's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


SkyWater Technology (SkyWater Technology) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
2401 East 86th Street, Bloomington, MN, USA, 55425
SkyWater Technology Inc is a U.S.-based, independent, pure-play technology foundry that offers semiconductor development and manufacturing services from its fabrication facilities. In its technology as a service model, it leverages a foundation of proprietary technology to co-develop process technology intellectual property (IP) with its customers that enable disruptive concepts through its Technology Services for diverse microelectronics (integrated circuits) and related micro- and nanotechnology applications. It focuses on serving diversified, high-growth, end users in numerous vertical markets, including computation, aerospace, defense, or A&D, automotive and transportation, bio-health, consumer, and industrial/internet of things.
Executives
Thomas Sonderman director, officer: President & CEO 16 JONSPIN ROAD, WILMINGTON MA 01887
Christopher Hilberg officer: Chief Legal Officer 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Loren A Unterseher director, 10 percent owner 8799 BROOKLYN BLVD, MINNEAPOLIS MN 55445
Edward Daly director 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
John Sakamoto officer: President and COO 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Steve Manko officer: CFO 2401 EAST 86TH ST, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Bradley Ferguson officer: Chief Govt Affairs Officer 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Steve Kosier officer: Chief Technology Officer 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Amanda Daniel officer: Chief Human Resources Officer 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Mark Litecky officer: Chief Revenue Officer 2401 EAST 86TH STREET, BLOOMINGTON MN 55425
Ddk Developments, L.l.c. 10 percent owner C/O BART L. ZIBROWSKI, 740 SADDLE WOOD DRIVE, EAGAN MN 55123
Bart L Zibrowski 10 percent owner 740 SADDLE WOOD DRIVE, EAGAN MN 55123
Gregory B Graves director 129 CONCORD ROAD, BILLERICA MA 01821
John T Kurtzweil director C/O CIRRUS LOGIC, INC., 2901 VIA FORTUNA, AUSTIN TX 78746
Cmi Oxbow Partners, Llc director, 10 percent owner C/O OXBOW INDUSTRIES, LLC, 4450 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE 440, MINNEAPOLIS MN 55416

SkyWater Technology (SkyWater Technology) Headlines