NDAQ has been successfully added to your Stock Email Alerts list.
You can manage your stock email alerts here.
NDAQ has been removed from your Stock Email Alerts list.
Please enter Portfolio Name for new portfolio.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Nasdaq has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
The historical rank and industry rank for Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Nasdaq was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.
The historical data trend for Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Nasdaq Annual Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Trend | Dec14 | Dec15 | Dec16 | Dec17 | Dec18 | Dec19 | Dec20 | Dec21 | Dec22 | Dec23 | |||||||||||
Piotroski F-Score | Get a 7-Day Free Trial | 7.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 5.00 |
Nasdaq Quarterly Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dec19 | Mar20 | Jun20 | Sep20 | Dec20 | Mar21 | Jun21 | Sep21 | Dec21 | Mar22 | Jun22 | Sep22 | Dec22 | Mar23 | Jun23 | Sep23 | Dec23 | Mar24 | Jun24 | Sep24 | |
Piotroski F-Score | Get a 7-Day Free Trial | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 |
For the Financial Data & Stock Exchanges subindustry, Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
For the Capital Markets industry and Financial Services sector, Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
This Year (Sep24) TTM: | Last Year (Sep23) TTM: |
Net Income was 197 + 234 + 222 + 306 = $959 Mil. Cash Flow from Operations was 417 + 530 + 460 + 244 = $1,651 Mil. Revenue was 1647 + 1674 + 1792 + 1902 = $7,015 Mil. Gross Profit was 740 + 701 + 744 + 734 = $2,919 Mil. Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep23) to the end of this year (Sep24) was (24350 + 32294 + 30267 + 30210 + 30560) / 5 = $29536.2 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep23) was $24,350 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $9,758 Mil. Total Current Assets was $7,558 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was $7,933 Mil. |
Net Income was 241 + 302 + 267 + 294 = $1,104 Mil. Revenue was 1582 + 1533 + 1433 + 1451 = $5,999 Mil. Gross Profit was 588 + 595 + 599 + 613 = $2,395 Mil. Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep22) to the end of last year (Sep23) was (22941 + 20868 + 20775 + 25657 + 24350) / 5 = $22918.2 Mil. Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep22) was $22,941 Mil. Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $10,115 Mil. Total Current Assets was $12,351 Mil. Total Current Liabilities was $7,048 Mil. |
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Nasdaq's current Net Income (TTM) was 959.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Nasdaq's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,651.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 3. Change in Return on Assets
Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.
Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.
ROA (This Year) | = | Net Income | / | Total Assets (Sep23) |
= | 959 | / | 24350 | |
= | 0.03938398 |
ROA (Last Year) | = | Net Income | / | Total Assets (Sep22) |
= | 1104 | / | 22941 | |
= | 0.04812345 |
Nasdaq's return on assets of this year was 0.03938398. Nasdaq's return on assets of last year was 0.04812345.
==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.
Nasdaq's current Net Income (TTM) was 959. Nasdaq's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,651.
==> 1,651 > 959 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.
Funding
Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage
Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.
Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.
Gearing (This Year: Sep24) | = | Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation | / | Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24 |
= | 9758 | / | 29536.2 | |
= | 0.33037425 |
Gearing (Last Year: Sep23) | = | Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation | / | Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23 |
= | 10115 | / | 22918.2 | |
= | 0.44135229 |
Nasdaq's gearing of this year was 0.33037425. Nasdaq's gearing of last year was 0.44135229.
==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Current Ratio (This Year: Sep24) | = | Total Current Assets | / | Total Current Liabilities |
= | 7558 | / | 7933 | |
= | 0.95272911 |
Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep23) | = | Total Current Assets | / | Total Current Liabilities |
= | 12351 | / | 7048 | |
= | 1.75241203 |
Nasdaq's current ratio of this year was 0.95272911. Nasdaq's current ratio of last year was 1.75241203.
==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Nasdaq's number of shares in issue this year was 579.017. Nasdaq's number of shares in issue last year was 494.112.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
Gross Margin (This Year: TTM) | = | Gross Profit | / | Revenue |
= | 2919 | / | 7015 | |
= | 0.41610834 |
Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM) | = | Gross Profit | / | Revenue |
= | 2395 | / | 5999 | |
= | 0.39923321 |
Nasdaq's gross margin of this year was 0.41610834. Nasdaq's gross margin of last year was 0.39923321.
==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Asset Turnover (This Year) | = | Revenue | / | Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep23) |
= | 7015 | / | 24350 | |
= | 0.28809035 |
Asset Turnover (Last Year) | = | Revenue | / | Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep22) |
= | 5999 | / | 22941 | |
= | 0.26149688 |
Nasdaq's asset turnover of this year was 0.28809035. Nasdaq's asset turnover of last year was 0.26149688.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score | = | Que. 1 | + | Que. 2 | + | Que. 3 | + | Que. 4 | + | Que. 5 | + | Que. 6 | + | Que. 7 | + | Que. 8 | + | Que. 9 |
= | 1 | + | 1 | + | 0 | + | 1 | + | 1 | + | 0 | + | 0 | + | 1 | + | 1 | |
= | 6 |
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Nasdaq has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.
Nasdaq (NAS:NDAQ) Piotroski F-Score Explanation
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Nasdaq's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.
John Zecca | officer: Executive Vice President | 151 W. 42ND STREET, NEW YORK NY 10036 |
Bradley J Peterson | officer: Executive Vice President | ONE LIBERTY PLAZA, NEW YORK NY 10006 |
Adenza Parent, Lp | director, 10 percent owner | ONE MARKET PLAZA, SPEAR TOWER, SUITE 2400, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94150 |
Bryan Everard Smith | officer: Executive Vice President | 151 W. 42ND STREET, NEW YORK NY 10036 |
Borse Dubai Ltd | 10 percent owner | LEVEL 7, PRECINCT BLDG 5, GATE DISTRICT, PO BOX 506690, DUBAI INTL FINANCIAL CTR, DUBAI C0 00000 |
Spaht Paul Holden Jr. | director | 600 MONTGOMERY STREET, 20TH FLOOR, SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111 |
Thoma Bravo Ugp, Llc | director, 10 percent owner | 110 N. WACKER DRIVE, 32ND FLOOR, CHICAGO IL 60606 |
Ann M Dennison | officer: Controller and Prin Acctg Ofcr | ONE LIBERTY PLAZA, NEW YORK NY 10006 |
Johan Torgeby | director | 151 W. 42ND STREET, NEW YORK NY 10036 |
Jeffery W Yabuki | director | 255 FISERV DRIVE, BROOKFIELD WI 53045 |
Adena T Friedman | officer: Executive Vice President | 1801 K STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON DC 20006 |
Michael R Splinter | director | |
Steven D Black | director | C/O JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., 270 PARK AVENUE, NEW YORK NY 10017 |
Michelle Lynn Daly | officer: Controller and Prin Acctg Ofcr | 151 W. 42ND STREET, NEW YORK NY 10036 |
Brendan Brothers | officer: Interim Head of AFC | 151 W. 42ND STREET, NEW YORK NY 10036 |
From GuruFocus
By GuruFocus Research • 07-26-2024
By Marketwired • 09-06-2024
By GuruFocus Research • 07-25-2024
By Marketwired • 07-26-2024
By Marketwired • 09-11-2024
By GlobeNewswire • 08-09-2024
By Marketwired • 09-04-2024
By Marketwired • 09-24-2024
By Marketwired • 08-09-2024
By Marketwired • 09-06-2024
Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker or a dealer. It has an affiliated registered investment adviser, which serves as the subadviser to an exchange traded fund. This investment adviser does not provide advice to individual investors. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. The individuals or entities selected as "gurus" may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. Gurus may be added or dropped from the GuruFocus site at any time. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC. Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.