GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » Ingersoll Rand Inc (NYSE:IR) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Ingersoll Rand (Ingersoll Rand) Piotroski F-Score : 9 (As of May. 08, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2017. Start your Free Trial

What is Ingersoll Rand Piotroski F-Score?

Good Sign:

Piotroski F-Score is 9, indicates a very healthy situation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ingersoll Rand has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

IR' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 7   Max: 9
Current: 9

During the past 10 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ingersoll Rand was 9. The lowest was 2. And the median was 7.


Ingersoll Rand Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Ingersoll Rand Piotroski F-Score Chart

Ingersoll Rand Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 8.00

Ingersoll Rand Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 9.00

Competitive Comparison of Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score

For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was 179.5 + 208.3 + 229.8 + 202.2 = $820 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 228.4 + 397.3 + 581.4 + 161.6 = $1,369 Mil.
Revenue was 1686.5 + 1738.9 + 1821.4 + 1670.1 = $6,917 Mil.
Gross Profit was 697.5 + 739.3 + 781.2 + 746.3 = $2,964 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(14995 + 15028.6 + 15154 + 15563.5 + 15529) / 5 = $15254.02 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was $14,995 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2,687 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $4,007 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,725 Mil.
Net Income was 138.5 + 145.1 + 217.4 + 161.1 = $662 Mil.

Revenue was 1439.9 + 1515.7 + 1623.7 + 1629.3 = $6,209 Mil.
Gross Profit was 569.8 + 575.3 + 654.4 + 664.2 = $2,464 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(15104.8 + 14221.4 + 14225.6 + 14765.9 + 14995) / 5 = $14662.54 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was $15,105 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $2,709 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $3,672 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,700 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ingersoll Rand's current Net Income (TTM) was 820. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Ingersoll Rand's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,369. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=819.8/14995
=0.05467156

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=662.1/15104.8
=0.04383375

Ingersoll Rand's return on assets of this year was 0.05467156. Ingersoll Rand's return on assets of last year was 0.04383375. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Ingersoll Rand's current Net Income (TTM) was 820. Ingersoll Rand's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,369. ==> 1,369 > 820 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=2687/15254.02
=0.17615029

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=2708.8/14662.54
=0.18474289

Ingersoll Rand's gearing of this year was 0.17615029. Ingersoll Rand's gearing of last year was 0.18474289. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=4006.8/1724.6
=2.32332135

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3672.4/1700.1
=2.16010823

Ingersoll Rand's current ratio of this year was 2.32332135. Ingersoll Rand's current ratio of last year was 2.16010823. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Ingersoll Rand's number of shares in issue this year was 407.9. Ingersoll Rand's number of shares in issue last year was 409.2. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2964.3/6916.9
=0.42855904

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2463.7/6208.6
=0.39682054

Ingersoll Rand's gross margin of this year was 0.42855904. Ingersoll Rand's gross margin of last year was 0.39682054. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=6916.9/14995
=0.46128043

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=6208.6/15104.8
=0.4110349

Ingersoll Rand's asset turnover of this year was 0.46128043. Ingersoll Rand's asset turnover of last year was 0.4110349. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
=9

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Ingersoll Rand has an F-score of 9. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.

Ingersoll Rand  (NYSE:IR) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Ingersoll Rand Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Ingersoll Rand's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Ingersoll Rand (Ingersoll Rand) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
525 Harbour Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, NC, USA, 28036
Ingersoll Rand was formed through the merger of Gardner Denver and Ingersoll Rand's industrial segment. The firm's portfolio consists of two business lines: industrial technologies and services and precision and science technologies. Ingersoll Rand serves a variety of end markets, including industrial, medical, and energy. Its broad portfolio of products includes compression, blower and vacuum, and fluid management. Ingersoll Rand generated roughly $5.9 billion in revenue in 2022.
Executives
Andrew R Schiesl officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Joanna Sohovich director 123 MAIN STREET, BRISTOL CT 06010
Julie Schertell director 3460 PRESTON RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 600, ALPHARETTA GA 30005
Santiago Arias Duval officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Vikram Kini officer: Senior Vice President and CFO C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Matthew J Emmerich officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Vicente Reynal director, officer: Chief Executive Officer C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Kathleen M. Keene officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Gary E Gillespie officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Michael J Scheske officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Jennifer Hartsock director C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Viseras Enrique Minarro officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Nicholas J Kendall-jones officer: See Remarks C/O INGERSOLL RAND INC., 525 HARBOUR PLACE DRIVE, SUITE 600, DAVIDSON NC 28036
Michael Stubblefield director C/O AVANTOR, INC., 100 MATSONFORD ROAD, RADNOR PA 19087
Mark P Stevenson director 850 LINCOLN CENTRE DRIVE, FOSTER CITY CA 94404

Ingersoll Rand (Ingersoll Rand) Headlines

From GuruFocus

Q3 2021 Ingersoll Rand Inc Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024

Q2 2022 Ingersoll Rand Inc Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024

Ingersoll Rand Inc Investor Day Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024

Q3 2022 Ingersoll Rand Inc Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024

Q1 2023 Ingersoll Rand Inc Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024

Q4 2021 Ingersoll Rand Inc Earnings Call Transcript

By GuruFocus Research 01-23-2024