- Glidelogic Corp. (GDLG, Financial) ResearchMind AI platform achieves a SOTA score improvement to 8.8-9.0.
- ResearchMind significantly cuts down proposal development time from days to under an hour.
- Despite improvements, ResearchMind's score is still below OpenAI ChatGPT's 9.5.
Glidelogic Corp. (GDLG) has announced an improvement in the performance of its ResearchMind AI research-proposal platform. Following a recent update integrating enhanced prompt-engineering modules and a reference-validation engine, ResearchMind's State-of-the-Art (SOTA) score increased to 8.8-9.0, up from its initial baseline of 8.5/10.
The evaluation, conducted independently, benchmarked ResearchMind against top models like OpenAI's ChatGPT, which scored 9.5, and other specialized deep-research engines that scored in the 8.8-9.2 range. The SOTA scoring framework evaluated five critical dimensions: Scholarly Context & Literature Review (30%), Methodological Soundness (30%), Innovative Contribution (15%), Argumentation & Clarity (15%), and Ethical & Practical Viability (10%).
Yitian Xue, CEO of Glidelogic, emphasized that ResearchMind now delivers proposals that are rated B+ to A- and dramatically reduces the time required for proposal development from days to under an hour. Glidelogic views these results as a baseline for continued innovation, with future plans to include live-data case studies and adaptive learning components.
For more information about ResearchMind's capabilities or to request a trial, please visit the official platform website at https://dr.glidelogic.ai.
