U.S. Stock Market Faces "Super Bubble" Risk, Warns Jeremy Grantham

Author's Avatar
Mar 02, 2025

Renowned value investor and GMO co-founder Jeremy Grantham (Trades, Portfolio) has issued a stark warning about the U.S. stock market, describing it as being in a "super bubble." Grantham, known for accurately predicting past market bubbles, forecasts a significant downturn, stating that the longer a bubble lasts and the higher it rises, the worse the outcome.

Grantham highlights that current U.S. stock valuations have surpassed those of 1929 and 2021, only behind Japan's 1989 bubble. Traditional valuation metrics like the Shiller P/E ratio and the total market cap to GDP ratio indicate that the market is at historical highs. Grantham's models suggest there is still a 50% downside risk before valuations return to normal levels.

Grantham also expresses concern over the long-term impact of declining populations, which he believes will dampen economic growth and productivity. He advises investors to focus on long-term trends and societal issues.

Regarding the current AI boom, Grantham sees parallels with past technology bubbles, noting that every major new technology has been accompanied by a bubble. He cites Amazon as an example, which saw its stock price plummet during the dot-com crash but eventually became a dominant company.

Grantham advises caution in the face of potential market declines, suggesting that investors focus on companies with long-term growth potential and strong financial health. He is particularly optimistic about the green economy, which he sees as essential for addressing climate change.

In terms of global investment strategy, Grantham is more optimistic about non-U.S. markets, which he believes pose less risk and could outperform the U.S. market over the next 5 to 10 years. He also comments on cryptocurrencies, viewing them as speculative rather than a medium of exchange, and suggests that gold, despite its limitations, is a better hedge than Bitcoin.

Grantham critiques traditional economic theories for their inability to address real-world issues, emphasizing the importance of considering materials and energy in economic models.

Disclosures

I/We may personally own shares in some of the companies mentioned above. However, those positions are not material to either the company or to my/our portfolios.