John Rogers Ariel Fund Second Quarterly Commentary

Author's Avatar
Jul 18, 2013
Investing in small and mid-cap stocks is more risky and more volatile than investing in large cap stocks. Ariel Fund often invests a significant portion of its assets in companies within the financial services and consumer discretionary sectors and its performance may suffer if these sectors underperform the overall stock market. Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All performance assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and represents returns of the Investor Class shares. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor's shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. For the period ended June 30, 2013, the average annual total returns of Ariel Fund (Investor Class) for the one-, five- and ten-year periods were +30.68%, +10.65% and +7.48%, respectively. Ariel Fund's Investor Class shares had an annual expense ratio of 1.06% for the year ended September 30, 2012. Performance data current to the most recent month-end for Ariel Fund may be obtained by visiting our web site, arielinvestments.com.

Wow, that happened fast. Or so we think many investors would say. For a typical U.S. investor holding a portfolio diversified across domestic stocks, foreign stocks and bonds, the year started quite well. Through the first four months, there were down months here and there in an asset class or two, but most holdings showed gains— handsome ones in stocks. Cracks showed in May in foreign stocks and bonds, and then most everything fell in June. U.S. bonds lost more than -1% (for the second straight month), emerging market stocks lost more than -6% and domestic large-caps lost more than -1%. Those losses seem minor by comparison to gold, which as reported in The Wall Street Journal, "fell -23% in the second quarter, the biggest quarterly decline since trading of U.S. gold futures began in 1974." Conventional wisdom holds that it was Ben Bernanke's mid-June comments about quantitative easing that spurred the rout. To our minds, he simply signaled that quantitative easing would slow down at some point, which we would have thought an obvious truth. Many reacted, however, as if it was new and harsh news. We were pleased that the effects were less dramatic on our investment universes than they were on the recently popular areas such as bonds, emerging markets stocks and gold. So it is with pleasure that we note our positive returns during a difficult quarter. In the second quarter of 2013, Ariel Fund returned +1.69%, a gain between the Russell 2500 Value Index and the Russell 2000 Value Index, which rose +1.54% and +2.47%, respectively.

Several of our holdings posted strong returns this quarter. Magazine publisher Meredith Corp. (MDP, Financial) soared +25.91% due to an earnings beat. Specifically, the company reported adjusted EPS of $0.72 versus consensus of $0.68. Revenues climbed 7% to $370 million, topping estimates of $355 million. A primary driver of results was advertising revenues—both national and local advertising increased substantially. In addition, the company brought down net debt from $340 million at the beginning of the year to $331 million as of the earnings announcement on April 25th. We believe the company has traversed a tricky landscape well over the last few years, sticking to its core competencies and smartly improving its already solid balance sheet. Injectible drug specialist Hospira, Inc. (HSP, Financial) shot up +16.69% on good and surprising news about a new compound. Specifically, its Inflectra drug—a biosimilar medicine to Remicade— was recommended for approval by a crucial European authority for multiple treatments. In Europe, it is likely to be approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and plaque psoriasis. Typically, a drug is only approved for one condition first and then may receive other indications over time. Given Remicade had sales of roughly $2 billion in Europe last year, this was huge news. In recent quarters, there has been such a tight focus on existing facilities and historical problems that few have looked to the future. Our point of view has been the issues will get fixed and the company will go on to create new and better compounds to continue to drive growth; it seems the market needed a reminder such a future was even possible.

Some of our holdings struggled in the second quarter. Mortgage insurer First American Financial Corp. (FAF, Financial) slid -13.35% despite a good overall quarter. We believe the market was essentially confused. The company's official earnings per share were $0.33 versus the $0.42 consensus. The key reason for the miss, however, was a large reserve charge dating to the 2006-2007 period. Without the charge, earnings would have been roughly $0.44 per share. Revenues exceeded expectations by increasing +19%, and purchase orders were up +13%. Admittedly, those were trade-offs for refinancings, which were down -7%. Management was upbeat and optimistic about business, a perspective we think was fully justified. The stock now trades below 1x book, which we think is very cheap given its profitability, powerful market position and business trajectory. Natural gas producer Contango Oil & Gas Co. (MCF, Financial) slipped -15.81%, largely due to an acquisition. The company was also negatively affected by both the write down of a key reserve and a one-off maintenance on an important well. Clearly, however, the most important event was the acquisition of Crimson Exploration (CXPO, Financial). The market responded as if it were a surprise, but we did not think it one. That is, Contango had always operated with no debt, and eventually it would follow one of two paths: sell itself to a larger producer or use its balance sheet to acquire a distressed, leveraged competitor. In doing the latter, Contango emerges with more assets, more cash flows and yet has low leverage. We continue to admire the company and believe it to be quite cheap.

During the quarter, we initiated one position and exited two positions in Ariel Fund. We added MTS Systems Corp. (MTSC, Financial), which specializes in physical testing equipment. It occupies a key, important niche for manufacturing firms that are doing more and more virtual testing. In our view, companies are unlikely to abandon real-world physical tests; that stance is a contrarian one in a world where many believe virtual testing will eventually completely take over. In addition to significant potential growth, it boasts good operating margins, a sturdy balance sheet, and remains a very trusted brand. We sold Life Technologies Corp. (LIFE) on the news that Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO, Financial) had signed a definitive agreement to acquire it for $76 per share. We also liquidated the position in Zimmer Holdings, Inc. (ZMH, Financial) in order to pursue more compelling opportunities.

For our part, we have not looked to ultra-low interest rates, quantitative easing or any other monetary policies to guide our investing. That is, we have been confident all along they would have their intended effects—to help stimulate the U.S. economy—but we never saw them as driving our investment process. So we find it odd when we hear some were attempting to act with highly precise timing, to use "easy money" as long as it lasted and then shift to different assets just before the policy changed. All along, we have looked toward individual companies we thought were trading at cheap prices relative to their likely futures in the U.S. economy. We not only have followed that policy for the last several years, but we have always done so and expect to do so moving forward. This commentary candidly discusses a number of individual companies.

These opinions are current as of the date of this commentary but are subject to change. The information provided in this commentary does not provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment decision and should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell any particular security.

As of 6/30/13, Meredith Corp. comprised 3.3% of Ariel Fund; Hospira, Inc. 4.0%; First American Financial Corp. 2.8%; Contango Oil & Gas Co. 2.0%; Crimson Exploration 0.0%; MTS Systems Corp. 1.0; Life Technologies Corp. 0.0%; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 0.0%; and Zimmer Holdings, Inc. 0.0%. Portfolio holdings are subject to change. The performance of any single portfolio holding is no indication of the performance of other portfolio holdings of Ariel Fund.

The Russell 2500™ Value Index measures the performance of the small to mid-cap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2500 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000® Value Index measures the performance of the smallcap value segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes those Russell 2000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. Russell® is a trademark of Russell Investment Group, which is the source and owner of the Russell Indexes' trademarks, service marks and copyrights. Bonds are fixed income securities in that at the time of the purchase of a bond, the amount of income and the timing of the payments are known. Risks of bonds include credit risk and interest rate risk, both of which may affect a bond's investment value by resulting in lower bond prices or an eventual decrease in income. Treasury bonds are issued by the government of the United States. Payment of principal and interest is guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and interest earned is exempt from state and local taxes. Investments in foreign securities may underperform and may be more volatile than comparable U.S. stocks because of the risks involving foreign economies and markets, foreign political systems, foreign regulatory standards, foreign currencies and taxes. Investments in emerging and developing markets present additional risks, such as difficulties in selling on a timely basis and at an acceptable price. The value of investments in gold can be extremely volatile and change quickly and can be affected by political and economic factors, supply and demand, the value of currencies, and speculation.

Investors should consider carefully the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses before investing. For a current prospectus or summary prospectus which contains this and other information about the funds offered by Ariel Investment Trust, call us at 800- 292-7435 or visit our web site, arielinvestments.com. Please read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing. Distributed by Ariel Distributors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ariel Investments, LLC.